TexasEscapes.comHistoric Texas: The Past As It Is Today
Columns: Historical, Humor and Opinion
Over 1000 Texas Towns & Ghost Towns
NEW : : RESERVATIONS : : TEXAS TOWNS A-Z : : FEATURES : : COLUMNS : : ARCHITECTURE : : IMAGES : : SITE MAP
HOME
SEARCH SITE
FORUM
RESERVATIONS
Hotels
Cars
Air
USA
World
Cruises
TEXAS TRAVEL
TOWNS A to Z
Towns by Region
GHOST TOWNS
TRIPS :
State Parks
Rivers
Lakes
Drives
Maps
LODGING
TEXAS
COLUMNS
FEATURES :
Ghosts
People
Historic Trees
Cemeteries
ARCHITECTURE :
Courthouses
Jails
Bridges
Theaters
Churches
Gas Stations
Water Towers
Monuments
Statues

Schoolhouses
Post Offices
Depots
IMAGES :
Old Neon
Murals
Signs
BOOKS
Links
TE
Site Information
Recommend Us
Newsletter
About Us
Contact TE
 
 Texas : Features : Columns : Letters From North America :

"There Ain't No Free Lunch"

by Peary Perry
Peary Perry
Last week I got into a discussion with a couple of my sons over a dispute they were having as a result of moving into a new apartment. It seems one of the bedrooms was larger than the other one and they had to come up with some method of choosing who got which one. One of my sons suggested they draw cards and the highest card drawn won the larger room.

A common sense approach.

Only problem was, he drew the card over the phone and claimed he had a king, leaving the other son the option of drawing only an ace to win.

Now, I have no problem with his honesty in this matter, but I advised them that I thought the drawing should be held in plain view, not over the phone. As you might imagine, the son who lost agreed and the one who won didn't. When I was asked to explain my reasoning, I suggested that he pick a number between one and ten and if he guessed it correctly, then I'd give him $1,000. He guessed 5 and I told him the number was 7, so he lost.

He wanted to know how he could be certain that the number had really been 7 and not 5, and I told him he couldn't…he'd just have to believe me, the same way his brother did when he drew the card over the phone.

Well, the end of this story is that they drew again and it all worked out.

But, then one of my other sons came up for the weekend and was enthralled over the new world series of poker craze that seems to be on television twenty four hours each day. I sat down with him for a couple of hours, but soon got bored with it and left to fix me a sandwich. He came into the kitchen and we started talking about the poker games. He thought they were neat and interesting and I felt just the opposite.

I was looking at the contestants in these things and most of them looked like they didn't have two nickels to rub together, much less a couple of million dollars to bet against other players. My son admitted that the casino puts up the money and they only win a portion of it, but it still could be a sizeable payoff. I countered that it looked fake to me, much like professional (?) wrestling with a lot of posturing and game playing. He says that's what makes it fun and interesting and I said it's easy to be dramatic when you're playing with someone else's money and not your own.

"What… the pot stands at $2,500,000? I'll raise to $5,000,000."

I find this laughable coming from a guy who has been working in a truck stop in Missouri.

But, as they say, a sucker is born every minute.

This whole thing got me to thinking about the current craze of on line betting and gambling that seems to be everywhere you look these days. I've heard of folks getting hung up on these internet gambling sites and losing some big bucks, most of which they can ill afford.

I don't know about you, but I don't trust computers hidden away somewhere telling me that I've lost X amount of dollars on some game of chance. I like to be able to look into the eyes of anyone who stands a chance of taking my money, and sometimes even that doesn't always work. I mean look at it this way. Suppose you do get on line and bet some bucks and win some…what happens? You want to go back and do it again, right?

Sure and let's just suppose you are ahead by say 10 or 15 thousand dollars and you want to be a big winner so you decide to blow the whole thing on one bet…do you, in your right mind, think that a computer web site is going to let you win enough money to put them out of business? I don't think so.

Look at Las Vegas. Do you think they build those places because they lose money? Of course not, they build them because they win. But as long as people keep coming to a spot in the middle of the desert and throwing hard earned bucks into those machines and those crap tables…then the hotels will keep on getting bigger and bigger. It's all a matter of numbers. They know, and we don't, the odds of anyone winning over long periods of time. You look at the games with the highest chance of you losing and see which ones are the easiest for you to get to. Take a look at Keno and the slots…in the bathrooms and the airports…probably at the hospitals…more of them than anything else…why? Because the odds are you'll lose more than you'll win. Then look at games like baccarat and what happens? They limit the number of players and make the tables look intimidating. They also have to adjust the odds so they stand a better chance of winning…. this is the best game in the house for the player, but they don't want too many people playing since the odds are too great against the house.

So there you have it…. my version of why I don't bet in casinos or on line. I believe the old saying is still true…'there ain't no free lunch.' In case you didn't know, this saying originated in the late 1800's. The saloons and bars used to advertise "Free Lunch", but you had to buy beer or whiskey to be able to eat for free. So, as it was back then, it still is today…'there ain't no free lunch.'

© Peary Perry
Letters From North America
- March 16, 2006 column
Syndicated weekly in 80 newspapers
Comments go to www.pearyperry.com

More Columns
HOME
Privacy Statement | Disclaimer
Website Content Copyright ©1998-2005. Texas Escapes - Blueprints For Travel, LLC. All Rights Reserved
This page last modified: March 16, 2006